Are Estate Legal Fees Tax Deductible? A Comprehensive Guide
#Estate #Legal #Fees #Deductible #Comprehensive #Guide
Are Estate Legal Fees Tax Deductible? A Comprehensive Guide
Introduction: Understanding Estate Legal Fee Deductibility
Alright, let's cut to the chase on a topic that often leaves people scratching their heads, staring blankly at legal invoices, and wondering, "Can I actually write this off?" We're talking about estate legal fees and their deductibility for tax purposes. It sounds simple, right? You pay a lawyer to help with an estate, it's an expense, so it must be deductible. Oh, if only tax law were ever that straightforward! The reality, my friends, is a labyrinthine journey through IRS regulations, specific classifications, and some truly head-spinning distinctions. It's not just a yes or no answer; it's a "yes, if..." or "no, but..." kind of situation that demands a deep dive.
Navigating the complexities of estate administration is already a heavy lift, often coming at a time of grief and emotional strain. The last thing you need is added financial confusion, especially when it comes to understanding what expenses might actually lighten the tax burden. We’re not just talking about minor deductions here; legal fees can be substantial, and mismanaging their deductibility can lead to significant missed opportunities or, worse, unwelcome attention from the tax authorities. That’s why getting a handle on these specific rules isn't just a good idea; it's absolutely crucial for anyone acting as an executor, administrator, or even a beneficiary trying to make sense of it all.
Think of it this way: the IRS isn't looking to give you a blanket pass on all legal expenses. They're meticulously categorizing every penny spent, trying to determine if it truly relates to the administration of the estate in a way that generates income, preserves assets, or fulfills a specific tax obligation. They’re not as concerned with expenses that primarily benefit individual heirs or are related to the personal planning that happened before the estate even existed. This distinction is where most people get tripped up, and honestly, it’s where a lot of perfectly legitimate deductions are overlooked simply because no one understood the nuances.
So, buckle up. We're going to unpack this beast, piece by painstaking piece. My goal here isn't just to tell you what the rules are, but to help you understand the logic behind them, to equip you with the knowledge to ask the right questions, and to empower you to work smarter, not harder, when it comes to managing the financial aftermath of an estate. Because, let’s be honest, dealing with a deceased loved one's affairs is hard enough without having to decipher the mysteries of the tax code all by yourself.
The Core Rule: IRS Stance on Estate Administration Expenses
At its heart, the IRS operates on a principle that is, for once, somewhat logical: expenses incurred in the administration of an estate are generally considered deductible. But here’s the kicker, and it’s a big one: they must be "ordinary and necessary" expenses. Now, "ordinary and necessary" in the tax world isn’t quite the same as in everyday conversation. It doesn't just mean "something everyone does" or "something you had to do." It means an expense that is common and accepted in the field of estate administration, and one that is appropriate and helpful for the development or preservation of the estate. This isn't a free-for-all, folks. There are strict conditions, and overlooking them is a surefire way to get a deduction denied.
When we talk about "administering an estate," we're picturing the executor or administrator diligently working to gather assets, pay off debts, manage property, and ultimately distribute what remains according to the will or state law. Legal fees that directly support these core functions are typically in the deductible zone. This could involve legal advice on how to interpret a complex will, counsel on selling an estate asset, or representation in a dispute that threatens the estate's value. The key is that the expense is incurred for the estate itself, not for the personal benefit of any single beneficiary. It's about preserving the whole pie before anyone gets a slice.
The strict conditions often revolve around the purpose of the expense. Was it for the collection of assets? The payment of debts? The distribution to heirs? Or was it something else entirely? The IRS is highly particular about distinguishing between expenses that maintain the integrity and value of the estate (good for deductions!) and those that are essentially personal expenses of the beneficiaries or relate to the creation of the estate plan itself (generally not deductible). This distinction, as we'll explore further, is where the rubber meets the road and where careful documentation becomes your best friend.
So, while the general principle offers a glimmer of hope for reducing the tax burden, don't walk into it blindly assuming every legal bill qualifies. Think of it as a gate with a very specific lock. You need the right key—the "ordinary and necessary" key, specifically tied to estate administration—to open it. Without that, you're just knocking on a locked door. Understanding this foundational rule is the first critical step in demystifying estate legal fee deductibility, setting the stage for us to dive into the specific categories that either make the cut or fall by the wayside.
Key Distinctions: Deductible vs. Non-Deductible Fee Categories
This is where the rubber truly meets the road, where the lines blur for many, and where a seasoned eye becomes invaluable. The IRS isn't interested in a lump sum bill that just says "Legal Services for Estate of [Deceased Person]." Oh no, they want precision. They want to know exactly what those legal fees were for, and whether that specific service falls into a deductible bucket or a non-deductible one. This differentiation is not just academic; it's the bedrock upon which your entire deduction strategy will be built. It's about understanding the nature of the legal work, not just the fact that a lawyer performed it.
Many executors, understandably overwhelmed, might assume that since the fees are for "the estate," they must all be treated the same. This is a common and potentially costly misconception. We need to dissect the legal bill, line by agonizing line, to determine its purpose. Was it to help the executor understand their fiduciary duties? Was it to defend the estate against a frivolous claim? Or was it for something more personal, like advising a specific heir on their inheritance rights? Each scenario has a different tax implication, and often, a single legal invoice will contain a mix of these services. This is why clear communication with your legal counsel and meticulous record-keeping are not just good practices; they are absolutely essential.
Administration vs. Distribution Fees
Let's start with a crucial distinction that trips up countless individuals: the difference between fees related to the general administration of an estate and those specifically for the distribution of assets to beneficiaries. Imagine the estate as a complex machine that needs to be maintained, operated, and eventually shut down. The fees for maintaining and operating that machine—paying its bills, ensuring its parts are functional, making sure it complies with all regulations—those are generally administration fees. They're about keeping the estate solvent and orderly.
However, once the machine has completed its work, and it's time to dismantle it and send the pieces to their new owners, the fees associated with that final step—the actual transfer of assets, the crafting of deeds for specific properties to heirs, the legal work to divide up remaining funds—these are typically considered distribution fees. The IRS views these as personal expenses of the beneficiaries, or at least not expenses that maintain or preserve the estate as an entity. They are expenses incurred after the administrative work is largely done, to facilitate the transfer of wealth, which is inherently a personal benefit to the recipients. It's a subtle but powerful difference, and it dictates deductibility.
Income-Producing Property Management Fees
Now, here's a category where you might find some significant deductions, especially if the deceased had a diverse portfolio or real estate holdings. Fees related to the management, conservation, or maintenance of income-producing property within the estate can be deductible. Think about it: if the estate owns a rental property, and you need a lawyer to advise on tenant disputes, lease agreements, or the sale of that property, those legal fees are directly tied to preserving or generating income for the estate. This isn't just about general upkeep; it's about the active management of assets that are either producing income or are held for the production of income.
This category often extends beyond just rental properties. It could include legal advice concerning the management of a stock portfolio, a business interest, or any other asset that either generates revenue or is intended to be sold for profit within the estate. The key here is the income-producing nature of the asset. The legal fees are seen as ordinary and necessary expenses incurred to manage an investment, much like an individual might deduct investment advisory fees (though the rules for individuals are different post-TCJA, which we'll get into). So, if your estate includes a portfolio of income-generating stocks, a commercial property, or even intellectual property that generates royalties, the legal expenses directly tied to managing those assets are often fair game for deduction.
Tax Advice vs. General Estate Planning Fees
This distinction is perhaps one of the most critical and frequently misunderstood. Fees for tax advice—specifically related to estate tax, income tax, or gift tax issues—are often deductible. This means if you're paying a lawyer to help prepare the estate's income tax return (Form 1041), or the federal estate tax return (Form 706), or to advise on complex tax implications of asset sales within the estate, those fees are generally deductible. Why? Because they are directly related to the estate's tax obligations and are considered ordinary and necessary for its administration. This also includes advice on minimizing the estate's tax liability, as that's a direct benefit to the estate's overall value.
However, fees for general estate planning, such as drafting the deceased's will, creating trusts, or setting up powers of attorney before death, are almost universally not deductible. These are considered personal expenses of the deceased, incurred to arrange their affairs while they were alive. The fact that the will or trust now dictates the estate's distribution doesn't suddenly make the cost of its creation an estate administration expense. It's a crucial difference in timing and purpose: one is about managing the estate after death, the other is about planning before death. This distinction is often a source of contention, but the IRS is pretty clear on it.
Fiduciary Duties & Related Expenses
Executors and administrators, often called fiduciaries, shoulder a tremendous burden of responsibility. They have a legal and ethical obligation to manage the estate's assets prudently, pay its debts, and distribute property according to the deceased's wishes or state law. Legal fees incurred by the executor or administrator in fulfilling these fiduciary duties are typically deductible. This can encompass a broad range of services, including legal counsel on understanding the will, navigating probate court, dealing with creditors, or even defending the executor against claims of mismanagement.
Essentially, any legal advice that helps the fiduciary perform their role correctly and legally, ensuring the estate is administered properly, falls into this category. It's about the cost of professional guidance that is necessary for the executor to avoid personal liability and to ensure the estate is handled in accordance with the law. This is a significant area of deductibility because almost every executor will, at some point, need legal counsel to properly discharge their duties, especially in complex estates. It’s not a personal expense of the executor; it's an expense of the estate to ensure its proper governance.
*
Pro-Tip: The Power of Itemized Billing
Never, ever accept a vague legal bill. Insist that your attorney itemize their services meticulously. A bill that simply says "Estate Services: $15,000" is a nightmare for tax purposes. You need it broken down: "$2,000 for Form 706 preparation," "$3,000 for managing sale of rental property," "$1,000 for advice on beneficiary distributions," "$9,000 for probate court representation." This level of detail is critical for properly identifying deductible vs. non-deductible expenses and maximizing your legitimate write-offs. Without it, the IRS might disallow everything if they can't determine the specific purpose.
*
Who Can Deduct? The Estate vs. The Beneficiary
This is another fork in the road where many get lost, and frankly, the rules have shifted in recent years, adding another layer of complexity. The fundamental question is: who, exactly, gets to claim these deductions? Is it the estate as a separate legal entity, or are the individual beneficiaries able to claim them on their personal tax returns? The answer, as you might expect, is "it depends," and understanding the distinction is paramount for proper tax planning.
Historically, there was a bit more flexibility, but current law, particularly post-TCJA, has tightened the screws significantly on beneficiaries. For the most part, we're talking about the estate claiming these deductions. However, there are specific forms and pathways for the estate to do so, and knowing which path to take can have substantial implications for the overall tax burden. This isn't just about who can deduct, but who should deduct, based on the tax situation of the estate and its beneficiaries.
The Estate's Perspective: Form 706 and Form 1041
From the estate's point of view, there are two primary battlegrounds for claiming deductions: the federal estate tax return (Form 706) and the estate's income tax return (Form 1041). This is where the "double deduction rule" (which we'll explore later) comes into play, as you generally can't deduct the same expense on both forms. It's an either/or choice, and it's a strategic one.
Form 706 (Federal Estate Tax Return): This form is filed if the gross estate, plus any adjusted taxable gifts, exceeds the federal estate tax exemption amount (which is quite high, currently over $13 million per individual for 2024). On Form 706, specifically on Schedule K, "Debts of the Decedent and Mortgages and Liens," and Schedule J, "Funeral Expenses and Expenses Incurred in Administering Property Subject to Claims," the estate can deduct certain administration expenses, including qualifying legal fees. These deductions reduce the taxable estate*, thereby lowering any potential federal estate tax liability. This is often the preferred route if the estate is large enough to trigger estate tax, as the estate tax rate can be quite high (up to 40%).
Form 1041 (U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates and Trusts): Even if an estate doesn't owe federal estate tax, it might still have income during the administration period (e.g., rental income, investment dividends, capital gains from selling assets). This income is reported on Form 1041. On this form, the estate can deduct administration expenses, including legal fees, that are attributable to the production or collection of income, or the management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for the production of income. These deductions reduce the estate's taxable income*, lowering its income tax bill. This is often the chosen path for smaller estates or those that won't owe federal estate tax but have significant income during administration.
The decision of where to deduct these expenses is a strategic dance, often involving a comparison of the estate tax rate versus the estate's income tax rate, and sometimes even considering the beneficiaries' individual income tax rates if the estate can pass through certain deductions. It's a complex calculation, and it's precisely why you need a seasoned tax professional in your corner.
The Beneficiary's Perspective: Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions (Current Status)
Ah, the beneficiary's perspective, once a glimmer of hope, now largely a mirage thanks to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017. Before TCJA, individual beneficiaries could, in certain circumstances, deduct their share of estate-related legal fees as "miscellaneous itemized deductions" subject to a 2% adjusted gross income (AGI) floor. This meant that only the amount exceeding 2% of their AGI was deductible. It wasn't perfect, but it was something.
However, the TCJA, which became effective in 2018, suspended most miscellaneous itemized deductions that were subject to the 2% AGI floor for tax years 2018 through 2025. This means that, for the vast majority of individual beneficiaries, claiming a deduction for estate legal fees on their personal Form 1040 is simply not possible during this period. The door has been firmly shut. This change has put even more emphasis on the estate itself claiming these deductions, as it's often the only avenue left. It's a significant shift that many people are still unaware of, leading to frustrated attempts to claim deductions that no longer exist for them.
Specific Types of Potentially Deductible Estate Legal Fees
Let's get down to the nitty-gritty and outline some specific categories of legal fees that typically do qualify for deduction. This isn't an exhaustive list, but it covers the most common scenarios and gives you a clear understanding of what the IRS is generally okay with. Remember, the overarching theme is that these fees must be "ordinary and necessary" for the administration of the estate, not for the personal benefit of heirs or for pre-death planning.
Estate Tax Preparation Fees
This is a pretty straightforward one, thankfully. Fees paid to legal counsel for the preparation of federal estate tax returns (Form 706) and any state estate or inheritance tax returns are deductible. This is considered a direct administrative expense, as the estate has a legal obligation to file these returns. The advice and work involved in valuing assets, calculating deductions, and ensuring proper compliance with estate tax law are all part of administering the estate's tax obligations. It's a clear-cut case of an expense incurred to fulfill a statutory requirement of the estate.
Income Tax Preparation for the Estate
Similarly, legal fees incurred for preparing the estate's income tax returns (Form 1041) are also deductible. Just like an individual or a business, an estate can generate income during its administration period, and that income needs to be reported to the IRS. Legal professionals often assist with this, especially if the estate has complex income streams, capital gains, or specific tax elections to make. These fees are directly related to managing the estate's financial obligations and ensuring its compliance with income tax laws, making them a legitimate administrative expense.
Fees Related to Managing Investment Property
As we touched on earlier, this is a fertile ground for deductions. Legal fees for advice concerning the sale, management, or preservation of estate investment assets are typically deductible. Imagine an estate that includes a portfolio of stocks, bonds, or mutual funds. If the executor needs legal advice on how to best manage these investments, whether to sell them, or how to handle capital gains, those fees are generally deductible. The same applies to real estate held for investment purposes, such as rental properties. Legal work for drafting leases, handling tenant disputes, or overseeing the sale of such properties would fall under this umbrella. The key is that the property is income-producing or held for appreciation, and the legal fees are necessary to manage or protect that investment for the benefit of the estate.
Fees for Defending the Estate Against Claims
This is an incredibly important category, as estates can unfortunately become targets for various claims. Legal fees used to defend the estate against creditors, lawsuits, or other challenges that threaten to diminish its assets are generally deductible. For instance, if a disgruntled former business partner sues the estate, or a creditor makes an unsubstantiated claim against the deceased's assets, the legal fees incurred to defend the estate are considered ordinary and necessary to preserve its value. This protection of the estate's corpus directly benefits the estate as a whole, ensuring that as much as possible remains for legitimate distribution.
Fees for Fiduciary Advice & Guidance
Executors and administrators, especially those who are family members without prior experience, often need legal guidance to understand and fulfill their complex fiduciary duties. Legal fees paid to advise the executor or administrator on their responsibilities, such as how to properly interpret a will, navigate probate court procedures, or fulfill their obligations to beneficiaries, are typically deductible. These fees are not for the personal benefit of the executor but are essential for the proper and lawful administration of the estate. They ensure that the executor acts prudently and in accordance with legal requirements, protecting both the estate and the executor from potential liability.
*
Insider Note: The "Ordinary and Necessary" Test is Key
When you're trying to figure out if a legal fee is deductible, always come back to the "ordinary and necessary" test. Would a reasonable person managing an estate typically incur this expense? Is it helpful and appropriate for the administration, conservation, or income production of the estate? If you can answer yes to these questions, you're usually on the right track. If it feels more like a personal expense or a pre-death planning cost, be wary.
*
Non-Deductible Estate Legal Fees: Clear Exclusions
Just as important as knowing what is deductible is having a crystal-clear understanding of what isn't. Mischaracterizing non-deductible fees as deductible can lead to penalties, interest, and the unpleasant experience of an IRS audit. These exclusions are often where people make the most mistakes, primarily because they don't grasp the fundamental distinction between estate administration and personal or pre-death planning. Let's shine a light on these common pitfalls.
The IRS isn't trying to be mean-spirited here; they're simply drawing a line in the sand regarding the purpose of the expense. If the expense primarily benefits an individual heir, or if it relates to the creation of the estate plan itself (before the estate even existed), it's generally off-limits for deduction. This isn't about the amount of the fee, or even how vital the service felt at the time; it's purely about its categorization under tax law. Understanding these exclusions is just as crucial for effective tax planning as identifying the deductible ones.
Personal Estate Planning Fees (Will, Trust Creation)
This is probably the most common misconception. Many people assume that since a will or trust is central to an estate, the fees paid to create these documents should be deductible by the estate. This is incorrect. The costs associated with setting up the estate plan itself—drafting a will, creating a living trust, preparing powers of attorney, or other documents that define how assets will be handled after death—are considered personal expenses of the deceased, incurred during their lifetime. They are not expenses incurred by the estate during its administration. The estate didn't pay for them; the deceased did, as part of their personal financial planning. Therefore, these fees are emphatically not deductible by the estate.
It's a matter of timing and purpose. The estate, as a separate legal entity, only comes into being (for tax purposes, at least) upon the death of the individual. Expenses incurred before that point, even if they dictate the estate's future, are not expenses of the estate's administration. This is a hard line for the IRS, and it's one that often catches executors off guard.
Distribution-Related Fees
We've touched on this before, but it bears repeating with emphasis: fees solely for the distribution of assets to heirs are generally not deductible. While the executor needs to ensure assets get to the right people, the legal work involved in transferring those assets (e.g., preparing deeds to transfer real estate to beneficiaries, drafting assignment documents for specific personal property, or legal advice purely on how to divide assets among beneficiaries) is seen as benefiting the individual recipients, not the estate as an ongoing entity.
Think of it as the final act of closing down the estate. The administrative work of gathering, valuing, and managing assets is done. Now, the focus shifts to the personal act of wealth transfer. These fees are distinct from the broader administrative tasks of managing the estate's assets, paying its debts, or fulfilling its tax obligations. They are the costs associated with the beneficiaries receiving their inheritance, and as such, they are typically considered non-deductible by the estate.
Beneficiary's Personal Legal Advice
This is another area where the lines can get incredibly blurry, leading to disputes and disallowed deductions. Legal fees paid by a beneficiary for their own interests—for example, to contest a will, to sue the executor, to challenge the valuation of an asset, or to get advice purely on their personal inheritance rights—are typically not deductible by the estate. These are personal legal expenses of the individual beneficiary.
While such legal actions might indirectly affect the estate, the primary purpose of the legal fee is to advance the personal financial interests of one specific heir. The estate, as an entity, is not incurring these fees for its own administration, preservation, or income production. If a beneficiary pays a lawyer to argue for a larger share, that's their personal expense. If the estate then has to pay a lawyer to defend itself against that claim, those defense fees are deductible by the estate. See the critical difference? It’s all about whose interest the legal work is primarily serving.
The "Miscellaneous Itemized Deduction" Conundrum for Estates
Alright, let's dive into a particularly thorny patch of tax law, one that has caused no end of confusion and frustration since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) came into play. We're talking about miscellaneous itemized deductions, specifically how they apply (or don't apply) to estates and trusts. This isn't just a minor technicality; it's a significant shift that has altered how many estates approach their administrative expenses.
Before TCJA, certain administrative expenses of an estate, if deducted on Form 1041, were subject to a 2% adjusted gross income (AGI) floor. This meant that only the portion of these expenses exceeding 2% of the estate's AGI was deductible. It was a bit of a hurdle, but at least the deduction was still possible. TCJA changed the landscape dramatically, creating a peculiar dichotomy between individuals and estates/trusts.
Current Law: Suspension for Individuals
Let's quickly address the individual side first, just to provide context. The TCJA, for tax years 2018 through 2025, suspended most miscellaneous itemized deductions that were subject to the 2% AGI floor for individuals. This means that things like unreimbursed employee business expenses, tax preparation fees (for individuals), and certain investment expenses are simply not deductible on an individual's personal tax return during this period. The door is shut. Poof, gone. This has simplified things for some, but eliminated valuable deductions for others.
This suspension is temporary, set to "sunset" or expire after 2025, meaning these deductions could return in 2026 unless Congress acts to extend the suspension or make it permanent. But for now, for you and me as individual taxpayers, these deductions are largely a thing of the past.
Exceptions for Estates and Trusts: The 2% AGI Floor
Now, here's where it gets interesting and where estates and trusts stand apart. While the TCJA suspended the 2% AGI floor deductions for individuals, it did not explicitly do so for estates and trusts. This created a period of significant uncertainty and debate among tax professionals. Does the suspension apply to estates and trusts by extension, or are they exempt? The IRS eventually clarified this with proposed regulations (which are largely followed) and later final regulations, confirming that certain administrative expenses of estates and trusts are still deductible, but they remain subject to the 2% AGI floor.
This means that estates and trusts may still deduct certain "miscellaneous itemized deductions" that are considered "costs paid or incurred in connection with the administration of the estate or trust and that would not have been incurred if the property were not held in such estate or trust." These are often referred to as "unique" or "peculiar" to estates and trusts. Examples include:
- Trustee/Executor Fees: Fees paid to a non-beneficiary trustee or executor for their services.
- Attorney Fees: Legal fees for estate administration, especially those related to fiduciary duties, probate, or defending the estate.
- Accounting Fees: Fees for preparing estate accounts or tax returns (Form 1041, Form 706).
- Appraisal Fees: Costs for valuing estate assets for tax purposes.
However, these deductions are still subject to the pesky 2% AGI floor. So, an estate or trust can only deduct the amount of these expenses that exceeds 2% of its adjusted gross income. This can significantly limit the actual tax benefit, especially for estates with lower AGI or where the administrative expenses aren't exceptionally high. It's a nuanced rule that requires careful calculation and professional guidance to ensure proper application. The key takeaway is: while individuals are largely out of luck, estates and trusts still have a path, albeit a constrained one, for these specific administrative expenses.
*
Pro-Tip: "Unique" vs. "Common" Expenses for Estates
The IRS distinguishes between administrative expenses "unique" to an estate or trust (like fiduciary fees, probate court costs, or legal advice on complex trust documents) and those that are "commonly incurred by individuals" (like investment advisory fees for a brokerage account, which an individual might also pay). The "unique" expenses are generally fully deductible by the estate/trust, not subject to the 2% AGI floor. The "common" expenses, if incurred by the estate/trust, are subject to the 2% AGI floor. This distinction is critical and requires professional judgment.
*
Advanced Strategies & Insider Secrets for Maximizing Deductions
Okay, so we've navigated the basics and the tricky bits. Now, let's talk about playing chess, not checkers. For those with larger, more complex estates, or for executors who really want to optimize the tax outcome, there are some advanced strategies and insider secrets that can make a substantial difference. These aren't always obvious, and they require careful planning and often the collaboration of legal and tax professionals. It’s about being proactive and making informed decisions rather than simply reacting to invoices.
These strategies often revolve around understanding the interplay between different tax returns, the timing of deductions, and the meticulous allocation of expenses. It's where good advice pays for itself many times over, preventing double taxation or missed opportunities that could cost an estate tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, of dollars. This is the realm of sophisticated tax planning, where the details truly matter.
The Double Deduction Rule (IRC 642(g))
This is arguably one of the most critical rules in estate tax planning, and misunderstanding it can lead to serious headaches. Internal Revenue Code Section 642(g) generally prohibits the same expense from being deducted on both the federal estate tax return (Form 706) and the estate's income tax return (Form 1041). It's an either/or proposition. You pick one.
For example, if the estate incurs $10,000 in legal fees that qualify as administrative expenses, you can deduct that $10,000 on Form 706 to reduce the taxable estate, OR you can deduct it on Form 1041 to reduce the estate's taxable income. You cannot deduct it on both. The purpose of this rule is to prevent taxpayers from getting a double tax benefit from a single expense. It's a fundamental principle, and violating it is a big no-no.
However, there are exceptions. Expenses that are considered "deductions in respect of a decedent" (DRD) are generally deductible on both the estate tax return (Form 706) and by the recipient (either the estate or a beneficiary) on their income tax return. These are expenses